by Daniel Harrell
The Defense Department
employs a group of analysts who specialize in scrutinizing religious language
and behavior in order to authenticate terrorist communications. These Arabic
and Islamic theology scholars recently recognized language in one terrorist screed
to be subtly derived from the philosophy of a late 13th century
Syrian religious leader who declared jihad on fellow Muslims. This
Syrian philosophy is the sort of thing Muslim insurgents might read to justify
their own attacks on fellow Muslims in places like Iraq, Afghanistan or now in
Syria itself. This helpful ability to understand ancient doctrine and its
current implications has been labeled “forensic theology.” It’s been used to
pinpoint groups or individuals who pose the greatest threats to national
security.
In a way the Pharisees of
Jesus’ day were forensic theologians. Experts in Hebrew theology and Mosaic law,
they specialized in scrutinizing religious language and behavior. Not only did
they adjudicate authentic conformity to the Law, they pinpointed those
individuals and groups who posed the greatest threats to Israel’s national
security. To them, Jesus was especially dangerous. His sacrilegious speech and
rabble rousing warranted arrest. So they sent the Temple police out to pick him
up. Yet Jesus cagily eluded their grasp—without actually going anywhere. He
said: “I will be with you a little while longer, and
then I am going to him who sent me. You will search for me, but you
will not find me; and where I am, you cannot come.” The Jewish leaders could only scratch
their heads.
If you’ve done much reading in John’s gospel, you know it to be
loaded with irony. Here the Jewish leaders wondered where Jesus thinks he’s
going that they would be unable to find him. They mockingly surmised about his
going to teach Gentiles, an absurd notion for any rabbi claiming to be sent
from Israel’s God. Jews don’t talk to Gentiles. But ironically the gospel did extend to Gentiles who embraced it
in ways most Jews refused. Jesus also declared that his time was short. This
would have been welcome news to the Pharisees who were so eager to be rid of
him that they plotted his death. But killing Jesus only spelled their own demise.
After rising from the dead and sending His Spirit, Jesus became more vitally
and universally present than he ever was while walking the earth.
The Pharisee Nicodemus (of John 3:16 fame) shows up to ask whether legally
they could judge Jesus without a hearing. Again irony is at work: Those who
demanded strict adherence to the law were not themselves obeying it. The rest
of the Pharisees cut Nicodemus off and accused him of “campaigning for that
Galilean.” “Examine the evidence,” they demanded, “See if any prophet ever
comes from Galilee!” But, of course Jesus was not from Galilee, as anybody’s
who’s ever read the Christmas story knows. Not that the pretentious Pharisees
would taken the time to check—they were so sure they were right.
I was out in Boston this week for a faith-science discussion that met
at the Harvard Faculty Club. I have so say that Harvard does pretentiousness
better than anybody. I miss it. Anyway, on my way back I stopped off in the Logan
airport Men’s Room. A woman came barreling in behind me, her bags confidently
slung on her shoulder. She looked at me and gave me this sly grin, then
condescendingly asked, “Still having trouble telling an M from a W?” Naturally
there was no need for me to respond. I only had to wait. 3, 2, 1… I’m so sure
that the entire terminal heard her scream. Certainty can be a dangerous thing.
The commoners who heard Jesus speak were not so sure—though they all
agreed Jesus was somebody special. Some hoped he might be the
Moses-like-Prophet-to-come promised by God in Deuteronomy. Others hoped he was
the King David-like-Messiah-to-come promised by Isaiah and Micah and others who
would restore Israel’s political and national fortunes. Even the Temple police
were inspired. “Never has anyone spoken like
this!” they said. The forensic
theologians berated them for coming back empty handed. The temple police acted as naïve as the
ignorant, unenlightened rabble whom Jesus also hoodwinked. Only fools believe.
Which ironically, is also true. As the apostle Paul wrote, a former Pharisee
himself, “God chose the foolish of the world to shame the wise; God chose what
is weak in the world to shame the strong.”
The context for all of this was the Jewish thanksgiving-like Feast of
Tabernacles; so named for the tents or “tabernacles” built to commemorate ancient Israel’s trek across the desert on
their way to the Promised Land. Jews, then as now, camp out in temporary
shelters to remind themselves of God’s promise of a permanent housing in the
face of fleeting earthly life. I remember an observant Jewish neighbor of mine
in the city who would pitch her tent in the middle of a parking lot, abandoning
the comfort of her condo in good Tabernacles tradition. Later I watched as a
suburban gentleman erected a tabernacle on his back deck; only his opened up
into a posh living room. I couldn’t help but feel that he was cheapening the
intent of Tabernacles. I also couldn’t help but mention this out loud in his
presence—in a joking way naturally. Knowing that I was a Christian, he came
back at me with four simple words: “plastic blinking nativity scenes.” Good
point.
Of course the main point of Tabernacles was not to
remember Israel’s time in the desert (they didn’t spend forty years wandering around as a reward for good behavior). The main point of Tabernacles was to remind
how in time God will usher his people into a new heaven and a new earth where
He will abide with them forever. On second thought, maybe that tent on the deck
did prove more apropos; inasmuch as
it was connected to something better. Tabernacles envisions that day when all
of our temporary, shabby shelters will be shed; a day when redeemed creation
will thrive in sync with heaven.
Tabernacles coincided with the grape and
olive harvests and included rituals geared to promote harvest success. Prayers
for needed rain were prayed in grand liturgical fashion. On seven days of the
eight day festival, and seven times on the seventh day, a priest would carry a
golden flagon down to the pool of Siloam (where legend held that angels
stirred the water). Then with a flagon full of water, the priest would lead a
pomp-laden parade back up to the Temple complete with singing, palm-waving and
trumpets. When the priest reached the altar, he’d circle it seven times and pour
out the water as a sacramental entreaty.
Needless to say, these
prayers inferred more than plain rain. As we have seen over and over this fall,
water is more than water in the Bible. At Creation, water was the chaos over
which God’s spirit spoke light and life into being. With Noah’s flood and the
Red Sea, water was God’s justice against evil. In the desert, the water Moses
drew from a rock proved God to be faithful even when his people weren’t. Ezekiel’s
miracle river of life pouring out from the Temple into the Dead Sea forecast
God’s redemption of all things. Here at the Feast of Tabernacles, water poured out
in the Temple stirred memories of God’s faithfulness in those original
tabernacle years which stirred hope for the future. “On that day,” Zechariah
declares, “living water will flow
out from Jerusalem…The LORD will be king over the whole earth. All nations …
will go up to worship the LORD Almighty, and to celebrate the Feast of
Tabernacles.”
Imagine the energy and
excitement this feast inspired; especially for people currently oppressed under
Roman occupation. If but for a moment, their minds were free to dream of that
day when their suffering would be washed away, their storehouses filled, their
joy complete and all their prayers answered. Picture being in the midst of all
of this intense expectation, enraptured by the celebration, filled with
passionate longing for God’s salvation. Add the promise of a new Moses who
single-handedly saved an enslaved people from tyranny. Mix in an ardent thirst
for a King David-like warrior in whose presence all nations would cower. Whip
all of this up to a fervent pitch—only to have some homeless, working-class, dingy
ex-carpenter stand up and shout: “It’s
me! I’m the one you’ve been hoping for!”
Seriously. That’d be like
somebody who’d prayed her whole life for prince charming, who’d packed a hope
chest full of baby clothes, who’d for years wistfully waited for Mr. Right to
appear, only to reach her Quarter Life crisis and have some homely, good for
nothing Mama’s boy waltz up and announce, “Hi honey, I’m home. Your prayers are
answered.”
But what if it turned out
to be true? Wouldn’t that be ironic?
In good Gospel of John
fashion, on the last and climatic
day of the Feast, Jesus stood and said in a loud voice, “Let anyone who is
thirsty come to me, and let the one who believes in me drink. As the scripture
has said (referring to the Old Testament), ‘Out of the believer’s heart shall
flow rivers of living water.” Jesus proclaimed himself to be Ezekiel’s river of
life. He is the Exodus Rock from which water gushed for the parched. He is the Temple
in whom God fully resides. Jesus embodied all of God’s great deeds of the past and
his great promises for the future. He is the body of water poured out, who gives
life to all who are thirsty, to any who will come to him and drink.
There is no life without water. Water participates in a incredible
array of processes every minute of every day—you need it to make soup and clean
computer chips, it drives the weather and shapes the face of the earth. The
human body is more than 60 percent water; it holds our body temperatures at 98.6
degrees. Your body’s water-balance
mechanisms are tuned with the precision of a digital chemistry lab, which is a
bit of bad news.
You not only don’t need to drink eight glasses of water every day, you cannot in any way make your complexion more youthful by drinking water. As author Charles Fishman writes, you cannot possibly “hydrate” your skin from the inside by drinking an extra bottle or two of Perrier. All that does is make you have to go more—albeit it in French.
You not only don’t need to drink eight glasses of water every day, you cannot in any way make your complexion more youthful by drinking water. As author Charles Fishman writes, you cannot possibly “hydrate” your skin from the inside by drinking an extra bottle or two of Perrier. All that does is make you have to go more—albeit it in French.
Clearly this is not what Jesus meant by rivers of living water
flowing from inside you. His water flows from your heart—which John tells us has
to do with the Holy Spirit. It’s a throwback to that John 3:16 conversation
with Nicodemus where Jesus said no one can enter the kingdom of God without
being reborn of water and spirit. Water and spirit go together at new creation
just like they did at creation—just as they did at Jesus’ baptism, just like
they do at our own baptisms. However “entering the kingdom of God” is not solely
about securing a reservation for the Pearly Gates. Like in the rest of the
Bible, genuine thirst-quenching faith reaps well-watered fruit of that faith. Not
only will we drink in the Spirit of
Jesus, but the spirit will pour out
of us too.
What does it look like to have a river of life flowing out of your
heart? No doubt it looks like love and joy and peace, patience and gentleness—virtues
understood to be fruits of the Spirit. But I wonder if Jesus has another virtue
in mind—especially given the contentiousness his Tabernacles declaration
incited. To enter the Kingdom of God was to reject the kingdoms of the world.
To declare yourself the fulfillment of Scripture, unless it was true, would be
tantamount to blasphemy. It takes a lot of guts to say all of that. It takes a
lot of guts to believe in somebody who says all of that. I mention it because the
word Jesus uses to describe the source of living water in us is actually not
the heart, but the belly. As the King James has Jesus saying it, “whoever
believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.”
Of course we can appreciate why Bibles go with heart instead of
belly. “Heart” does work as a synonym since the Greek word itself is about
motivation rather than anatomy. In ancient culture the seat of one’s motivations
was often the stomach, but in our culture, to talk about anything flowing out
of your belly can come off as a bit too, well, intestinal. And yet I wonder if the word heart has suffered from overuse—like when people say, “I mean it
from the bottom of my heart.” To be frank, “I mean it from the bottom of my
heart” is probably the last thing anybody would ever say who really does mean something
from the bottom of his heart.
Unfortunately, Christians who say they follow Jesus with “all of
their heart” are often those same Christians who when confronted by that hard
line Jesus draws between money and God, will say, “You don’t seriously have to sell
your possessions and give the money to the poor, just need to have a right
attitude toward them. Jesus said we’d always have the poor with us.” Or when
confronted by that hard line Jesus gives about loving your enemies, will insist
that Jesus only said pray for them,
he didn’t say speak to them ever
again.
Maybe that river of life needs to flow out of our bellies. Out of our
gut. It does take courage to truly follow Jesus. It takes guts to be honest
about your faith, guts to endure ostracism from the skeptic and the socially
careless, guts to speak honestly against injustice and cruelty when you’d
rather keep quiet and not draw attention; it takes guts to renounce materialism
and free up your resources for the poor, guts to bypass lucrative, personal
fame in order to serve other people, guts to serve without being thanked for
it. It takes guts to forgive those who’ve wronged you, guts to confess your sin
to those you’ve wronged, guts to work on your marriage, to hold your tongue
from gossip, to press on when troubles make God seem distant, it takes guts, it
takes courage, to seriously take up a cross and follow Jesus with all of your
heart.
British author and Christian GK Chesterton described it, ironically,
like this: “Courage is almost a contradiction in terms. It means a strong
desire to live taking the form of a readiness to die. ‘He that will lose his
life, the same shall save it,’ is not a piece of mysticism for saints and
heroes. It is a piece of everyday advice … [Christians] seek life in a spirit
of furious indifference to it; we desire life like water and yet drink death
like wine.” Indeed. The water of life is ultimately wine of resurrection. It’s
always served in a cross-shaped cup.